Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi to all, I recently purchased the new Nikon 12-24mm lens that was designed specifically their digital cameras. It was a very enlightening experience, because it demonstrated how a "blank page" design could really lead to some excellent quality and it illustrates an endearing comittment to a lens mount that has served them well over thirty years.... The lens offered very low distortion for a wide angle zoom, the off axis performance is excellent with minimal color. As someone who has designed lenses in the past, this lens is a technical tour de-force. Naturally, it's profoundly retro focus, the exit pupil is located quite a distance from the principle points so control of coma must have been a real problem for the designers. They seem to have done a fine job there. Off axis specular reflections are quite symmetrical and vignetting is quite minimal for a lens of that focal length. The designer could take into account the glass in front of the sensor and that is a real necessity for control of chromatic aberration. The lens utilizes the newer AFS motor which allows you to simply overide the auto focus, by manually focusing or you can simply switch it off at the lens. The combined weight of a D100 camera and this lens is less than 3/4 the weight of my M7 with the 35 summilux. A single battery is good for about 500 shots which nicely fills a DVD for archiving on the go. So, why do I keep the M series and R series cameras? They take great pictures (technically) and they are very tough. I've been working on workflow techniques to make the digital tone reproduction mimic the film->digital workflow but there are real challenges there. I ran an interesting series of tests that utilized 5 camera/film combinations (3 leica bodies (2M, 1 R) 2 Nikon bodies, 5 different types of film) compared to the digital output from the D100. I then took six different scenes. The film images were scanned in an LS4000 scanner and then all the digital files where printed at 12X18 inches using a fuji frontier printer. I then asked observers to rank-weight the images. In 5 of the six tests, the digital camera (6 Mega pixel) was judged "better". In one instance, the observers generally chose an image shot with an R6/Summilux 80 combination on a fine grain transparency film. One of the first observations was that whatever image quality advantage the leicas had on the film, was lost in the scanning-printing process. It appeared that grain noise was more objectional to the observers than resolution issues and the sharpening utilized in the digital camera images had very little impact on the apparent noise in the image. Inspite of the low resolution of the digital camera, the fact that it required only one optical step allowed for less sharpening and lower noise recording than the film combinations. I also suspect that the fuji frontier imaging system also contributed to the image degredation. So what I am seeing in my work and my tests is that the output path (scanning-> paper) is a greater limiting factor than digital resolution vs analog film resolution. Examination of the film images under a loop and higher magnifications showed that the Leica images may have a bit of an edge, but there was no obvious difference. That accounted for the obvious confusion in the evaluations of the reproductions after the digital image was removed from the test: no single camera/film combination stuck out as a winner. At this point in time, I feel pretty comfortable with either digital or analog workflows. If I'm in a situation that requires a wide dynamic range capture, I use negative film. If I'm shooting for saturation and sharpness, I'll use transparency film . If I need a decent image with almost no hassles or in a short time period, I'll shoot with digital and I know that at modest reproduction sizes, it will do just fine. Now I can stop screwing around with all this testing and just go out and shoot.... Tom Lianza Technical Director Sequel Imaging Inc.- A GretagMacbeth Company 25 Nashua Rd. Londonderry, NH 03053 - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html