Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, 1:1 is possible and cheaper. Add about 80% more to the time as for stock. More dilution is not recommended. Dan K. At 02:52 PM 7/8/03 -0600, you wrote: >Any ideas on minimum volumes of dev? > >Also, seems those who have replied use it full strength. Anyone using it 1:1 >or 1:3? > >thanks > >tim > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Robert > > Marvin > > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:20 PM > > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > Subject: Re: [Leica] d23 developer > > > > > > I've been using D23 for all my B & W developing for a couple of years > > with good results. I've found that the times for straight D76, in the > > "Massive Developing Chart" work fine. D23 is so cheap that its very > > economical to use stock solution as a one-shot, although, once in a > > while, if I'm developing a lot of film, I'll use it immediately for a > > second time, increasing development times by 10 percent. > > > > Bob Marvin > > > > At 4:12 PM -0400 7/8/03, Tim Atherton wrote: > > > > > >anyone using d23 developer? > > > > > >looking for some times for HP5 (and FP4) > > > > > >It's for sheet film, but Ilford generally gives the same times > > for sheet and > > >roll anyway. > > > > -- > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html