Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Perhaps more reason to avoid ebay
From: "Joseph Codispoti" <joecodi@clearsightusa.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:54:55 -0700
References: <000601c3452e$c1816240$16f0fc3e@steveuns>

In response to several posts:

eBay primarily provides information to authorities investigating crimes that
may be committed through the auction process. Were it not for eBay's
watchdog policies, there would be few honest auctions.

When in public one should not expect privacy. I would resent being
photographed only if I were being exploited in some way.
Should an individual in the process of being arrested have the right to
privacy (not being photographed)?

I cannot understand how so many really believe that they are shielded from
public scrutiny.
One need only ask for one's own credit report from the major four agency in
order to discover that the credit bureaus know more about the individual
than the individual himself.

When in 1935 the Social Security Act was passed by Congress privacy was
dealt the initial death knell. From birth an individual can be tracked
through the SS number. Then came the recording of finger prints (at birth)
and now DNA.

Years ago, when I saw restaurant's booths for the first time I thought that
it was an odd and contradictory practice to want to go out in public only to
hide in order to preserve privacy.

The more we think we are private, the less privacy we are accorded. The more
we expect privacy, the more we are disappointed.

Joseph Codispoti




- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Steve Unsworth" <mail@steveunsworth.co.uk> (RE: [Leica] Perhaps more reason to avoid ebay)