Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Harvey's 777 was Re: [Leica] OT tap water temperature in Chicago ...
From: Mike Durling <durling@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 21:42:42 -0400
References: <0D22A63A-ACC6-11D7-8267-0003938E4330@mac.com>

I was going to ask this off list, but what the heck others still develop 
their Leica negs at home.  I've read the article at 
http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Harvey/harvey.html about Harvey's 777 
developer and it looks interesting.

The article doesn't go into great detail about what the images look 
like.  Since it contains p-phenelyne diamine how is the sharpness of the 
negs developed in this soup?  Also, what kind of shadow detail do you 
get, and what speed do you rate your Tri-X?

Finally, what do you like about it?  Any particular problems?

I like to mix my own chemicals, but this requires a few that I don't 
ordinarily stock.

Thanks,

Mike D

David M. dorn wrote:
> 77 is just right if you just add another 7 and use Harvey's 777 
> developer.  It's at its best above 70 deg F.
> 
> My standard 777 temperature is 75deg even in winter (I use the JOBO 
> tempering bath).  In the summer I process at the ambient temperature.
> 
> Makes life much simpler and the results are superb with the new Tri X.
> 
> David
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "David M. dorn" <dmdorn_ct_usa@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] OT tap water temperature in Chicago area)