Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Very slight levels adjustment, straight digilux image otherwise. It handles interiors and "funny" light very well. I know it slows it down, but I'm not after speed with these images. Cheers On Monday, Jun 30, 2003, at 13:51 Australia/Melbourne, Daniel Ridings wrote: > That was nice, Alastair. The light in the shot looks lovely, creating a > nice atmosphere. > > Did you photoshop that one lux into the shot :) > > Daniel > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Alastair Firkin wrote: > >> I don't use my digilux at high iso, but I love its ability to take >> interiors with a little "support" >> >> http://stairfirkin.com/Mayimages/L1030156.JPG >> >> You don't get this without a lot of trouble if you are not able to >> white light. >> >> >> On Monday, Jun 30, 2003, at 03:02 Australia/Melbourne, Daniel Ridings >> wrote: >> >>> Digital and low-light is something I really appreciate. >>> >>> http://www.dlridings.com/paw2003/12.html >>> >>> This shot (an earlier paw) was done at EI 1600 and most of the others >>> (if >>> you click on the "here" link) were done, in Nikon's terms, "one step >>> above >>> 1600", that is, 3200. It would be difficult to do that sporting even >>> without digital. I did it with film (Fujicolor 1600) and I really >>> can't >>> see the difference and when I do, digital is better. Film shots can >>> be >>> seen at: >>> >>> http://www.dlridings.com/paw2003/11.html and >>> http://www.dlridings.com/paw2003/10.html >>> >>> Not to mention the work flow in getting about 70 pictures out to >>> anxiously >>> waiting girls (with an attention span of about 6 hours ... after >>> that, >>> these competitions are HISTORY). >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> >>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Tina Manley wrote: >>> >>>> At 10:15 AM 6/29/2003 -0600, you wrote: >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 07:10 AM, Tina Manley wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Digital is not there yet for low-light, but it's getting there. I >>>>>> love >>>>>> the depth of field of the M lenses and doubt that can be >>>>>> duplicated >>>>>> in >>>>>> digital, but you never know! >>>>> >>>>> I would have agreed with Tina on this without reservation until my >>>>> recent >>>>> acquisition of a Canon 10D, after playing with - er, evaluating - >>>>> one >>>>> owned by friend Bill Nelsch. >>>>> >>>>> Its low light performance is, in a word, excellent. To my eyes it >>>>> matches >>>>> film through ISO 800, and produces usable if pixelated images at >>>>> ISO >>>>> 1600. >>>>> At ISO 400 it is at least as good as film for my purposes, perhaps >>>>> better. >>>> >>>> >>>> That's great news, Will! I can't wait to try it out. Hope UPS gets >>>> here >>>> early tomorrow! >>>> >>>> Tina >>>> >>>> >>>> Tina Manley, ASMP >>>> www.tinamanley.com >>>> >>>> photos available from: >>>> www.pdiphotos.com >>>> www.workbookstock.com >>>> www.mira.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe, see >>>> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe, see >>> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >>> >>> >> Alastair >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see >> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > Alastair - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html