Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital has won....?
From: "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 09:05:26 -0700
References: <006801c33def$1efa15d0$0100a8c0@hal> <002201c33df6$6ee2eac0$0201000a@basecamp2win> <004c01c33dff$185e64a0$7ee76344@ph.cox.net> <002001c33e04$59c32b60$fbfea8c0@DHHZSZ11> <001801c33e47$746545a0$9cad5018@gv.shawcable.net>

Thank you, Ted.  You've said it just right.  ;-)

The other Ted, in Olalla

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital has won....?


> Ted Bayer concerned:
>
> >>>Digital has won....?<<<<
>
> Hi Ted from the other ted. ;-)
> Well old buddy here's a pro of a long time who's in awe everytime I look
at
> the digital world and you know what? It's sure an amazing visual capturing
> method and one that will eventually replace film. But at this point, "Damn
> the digi's, full speed a head!"
>
> However, it's not for me as a work tool.
>
> Yep I've had one of the whiz bang super machines in hand, popped frames
and
> watched them transmit in an instant from the middle of a sports field to
> half way around the world in the blink of an eye.
>
> And at the moment even though the digi's are gaining like an Indy car on
the
> back stretch and will undoubtedly win the race around the next curve, at
the
> moment all one has to do is read the posts of all the, "this is wrong,
this
> isn't, it'll never work, why can't they do, it's a monster in yer hands"
and
> a million other reasons why not to bother getting into it.
>
> Young lads and lasses just starting in a professional career "must have
them
> if they wish to survive" it's just the way it is. But like you, as long as
I
> continue to have people ask me to shoot assignments for them without a
digi
> cam of any make , or have film to use, I expect for at least another
twenty
> five years, that's fine by me. ;-)
>
> Besides, by then I'll need to slow down in any event! ;-) And it's really
> hard for an old dog to learn new tricks so I'm going to remain...... a
film
> kinda guy. :-)
>
> Hell if the rest of them rush off to digi's and leave, at least Ted & ted
> will have each other and our film to have fun, even if were shooting
things
> off the TV screen. ;-)
>
> ted
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Chandos Michael Brown" <cmbrow@wm.edu> (RE: Re: [Leica] Slide mounts/scanner feeders/workflow)
Message from "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com> (Re: Re: [Leica] Slide mounts/scanner feeders/workflow)
Message from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net> ([Leica] Digital has won....?)
Message from "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net> (Re: [Leica] Digital has won....?)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Digital has won....?)