Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced
From: "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:41:41 -0400
References: <MNELJONCHOKNFLMBFJCCMEFICDAA.kitmc@acmefoto.com> <004a01c33c51$952eddc0$6401a8c0@slnt.phub.net.cable.rogers.com>

Subject: Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced


> Ok, I'd like some clarification. The consensus seems to be the M lenses
are
> not suited to fit a digital body because of physics, angle of incidence or
> whatever.
>
> Now I realize that some of this will be buried in the archive, but I'm
> lazy...I'd rather someone tell me again. ;-)
>
> If the M camera can mount an M lense, and focus on the film plane, then it
> seems logical that that same film plane can be a digital sensor. Am I in
> deep space on this?
>

Deep space, wandering in orbit somewhere....Anyway, it's been said many
times, many ways, but the problem can be summed up with three words, "angle
of incidence."  The M body would have to be quite a bit wider front to back
to make the digital thing work.

Gary

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Jim McIntyre" <mcintyre@ca.inter.net> (Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced)
In reply to: Message from "Kit McChesney | acmefoto" <kitmc@acmefoto.com> (RE: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced)
Message from "Jim McIntyre" <mcintyre@ca.inter.net> (Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced)