Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/06/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced
From: "Jim McIntyre" <mcintyre@ca.inter.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 21:52:53 -0400
References: <A22FF3CF-A747-11D7-8F9B-000393802534@mac.com> <009101c33b7b$93dc2440$6401a8c0@slnt.phub.net.cable.rogers.com> <003f01c33b7f$821670e0$0300a8c0@c439786a>
In a nutshell, what were the reasons?
> Again, this was addressed in the online press conference. Not feasible,
> not now, not never. <snip>
>
> > Unfortunately, I think Leica got it backwards. They should have
> developed a
> > digital M body that takes M lenses <snip>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced)
Reply from "Phil Leeson" <pjleeson@mchsi.com> (Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced)
In reply to:
Message from Martin Howard <mvhoward@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced)
Message from "Jim McIntyre" <mcintyre@ca.inter.net> (Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced)
Message from "Phil Leeson" <pjleeson@mchsi.com> (Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced)