Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi A: Most of the Kodachrome slides I have taken over the past 50 years are still as good as they were when I received them back from Kodak...the Ektachromes have changed color and some are good, some not so good. Someone mentioned Agfa slides - some of mine have also faded badly. The color prints from the 50's are fading fast, but some are still pretty good. All of my black and white negatives and prints from 55 years ago are still excellent. As an aside, the black and white negatives (and the prints) my father took back in the twenties and thirties (many of these are not the "safety" film that came later) are as good today as they were then. I have a whole box full of them and they print up just fine. Who knows how the current films will stand up over time? I will continue to shoot film. Digital just doesn't cut it for me yet. Ted - ----- Original Message ----- From: "A. Lal" <alal@duke.poly.edu> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:28 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Film is Archival > With slide film, I'd rather be safe than sorry. Not sure how valid these claims are. > > > > There was a lot of talk in the 1970's that the Ektachrome was more stable > > than earlier versions. I used Ektachrome 50 almost exclusively then for > > scientific photography (macrophototgraphy and photomicrography), and the > > slides still look pretty good. The base of Kodachrome left a > > yellowish/greenish tint. Needless to say, the Kodachromes I took are still > > archivally yellowish/greenish. :-) > > > > Jeffery > > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html