Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Only time for one martini! Exhaustion took care of the rest!! :-) - --- Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> wrote: > Bob > > Your photographic methods from equipment to getting > the > prints to the parents agree with my opinions. But > one > question; How many tranquilizers did you need on > the trip? :-) > > Jerry > > Bob Adler wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > Last week I had the priviledge of traveling with > my > > daughter's 7th grade class on a field trip to D.C. > 41 > > 12/13 year old girls, 10 chaperones, an M6, M7, > 35/2, > > 50/1,4, 90/2,8, SF20 and Mr. Konnerman's > soft-fill. > > Additionally, Mr. Brick was generous enough to > loan me > > his RapidWinder which was placed on the M7. I > wanted > > to share some thoughts with you about the > performance > > of my equipment and film vs digital. > > > > One of the primary reasons that I moved to Leica > was > > to downsize the weight/volume of the equipment I > had > > to carry on "assignments" like this without loss > (and > > perhaps increase) of optical quality. I was able > to > > carry all of this photo equipment, plus cleaning > > supplies in a small, Domke PhotoRunner pack. What > a > > delight! All that photo capability hanging on my > hip > > at minimal weight and easily accessible. > > > > The equipment performed absolutely flawlessly. I > shot > > 10 rolls and got back 346 well exposed (and if I > may > > boast a little, well focused!) negatives. My M7 > > batteries went down, but I expected that and had > > spares, so not a shot was missed. I love this > > equipment!! > > > > I've often thought of moving back to SLRs for > digital > > shooting. I was concerned that digital would be > better > > for this type of trip as I could see if I got a > shot, > > could shoot a lot more, and could distribute the > > results to the parents quickly (electronically). > From > > this experience, I'd say there is no need. My > > negatives were developed with 2 prints each and > medium > > sized TIFF files burned to CDs for each roll > within 24 > > hours. I uploaded all the images for the parents > to > > Ofoto (a Kodak website for sharing and ordering > > prints) and as of this morning (Wednesday) all the > > families have access to all the photos to view and > > order as desired. I have a CD and two identical > photo > > albums to give to the school. I don't think > digitial > > would have been any faster and I have the > alternative > > to scan any negatives I like at a higher > resolution > > for more artistic display if desired. > > > > So I have the best of all worlds; a compact photo > > system that works flawlessly and provides > beautiful > > images, rapid sharing across a geographically > diverse > > community, and the ability to capture images to a > > medium that gives me the flexibility of old or new > > technologies for higher quality reproduction. Man, > it > > WAS worth it!! > > > > Thanks for reading. As I work on a couple of the > > images I like, I'll post them for you to see. I > was > > just so thrilled with how all this worked together > I > > wanted to share these thoughts with you. > > Bob > > > > ===== > > Bob Adler > > Palo Alto, CA > > rgacpa@pacbell.net > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html ===== Bob Adler Palo Alto, CA rgacpa@pacbell.net - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html