Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Summilux-M 50mm
From: "Nathan Wajsman (private)" <nathanw@bluewin.ch>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 06:47:39 +0200
References: <007301c31768$ff2fdbb0$0200a8c0@jim>

Why does all this make me think of something totally different from 
Leica photography?   ;-)

Nathan

Jim Shulman wrote:
> Well understand the problem:  last week I neglected to get my 3.5 Elmar
> fully erect for several shots, which were colorful but unacceptably
> soft.
> 
> Jim Shulman
> Bryn Mawr, PA
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Jerry
> Lehrer
> Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2003 10:49 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Summilux-M 50mm
> 
> Will
> 
> I have found that he who uses a collapsible lens, oft forgets
> to erect it.  When erect, my f2.8 Elmar was not that much
> shorter or lighter than my Summilux.  But oh, the difference
> in quality of image!
> 
> Jerry
> 
> Will von Dauster wrote:
> 
> 
>>Jerry,
>>
>>True enough, the 21-35-90 combination is hard to beat for overall
>>versatility. But the funny thing is, the older I get, the more I have
>>come to respect the humble - or not so humble - 50mm. It has become,
>>for me, maybe going backwards a little, the Leica equivalent of the
>>ubiquitous "28-80mm f1:somethingtiny" zoom lens seemingly supplied
> 
> with
> 
>>every SLR the last ten years or so. While admitting the limitations of
>>the walking zoom - ie stepping back or getting closer - if I'm going
> 
> to
> 
>>grab one lens, not knowing what I will encounter, it will be a 50mm.
>>
>>Will von Dauster
>>Denver
>>
>>Who just bought a very nice 50mm f2.8 to compliment his - relatively -
>>bulky Summilux 50. Fits nicely into a mini Billingham...
>>
>>On Saturday, May 10, 2003, at 01:46 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Will
>>>
>>>Oh, I admit that it is a superb lens and is MUCH appreciated by
>>>me, but mine is under-used, 'cause I like a 35mm focal length.
>>>
>>>I could live my Leica life with a 35mm and a 90mm.  Ooops,
>>>I almost forgot a 21mm!
>>>
>>>Jerry
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, see
> 
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 


- -- 
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: nathanw@bluewin.ch
mobile: +41 78 732 1430

Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2003.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Jim Shulman <garcia@chesco.com> (RE: [Leica] Summilux-M 50mm)