Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The Tri-Elmar flare thing
From: Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 19:50:42 +1000

I don't mind people repeating themselves when they have something to 
say. I have not notice distortion at 28mm, but to be fair, I've not 
looked for it.
On Saturday, Apr 26, 2003, at 11:01 Australia/Melbourne, Dan States 
wrote:

> Alastair, I did not use a hood, but in many of the shots I believe it 
> really would not have mattered.  In several cases I was shooting in a 
> well shaded and relatively dark area. (At a temple in rural Japan on a 
> cloudy day, shaded by heavy trees and a large gate.)  There was no 
> direct light shining on the camera at all.  Only a distant cloundy 
> background in a small portion of the center of the frame.  In these 
> shots the shadow detail was washed out with exactly the same flare you 
> showed in your scans.
>
> Indeed, if my very unscientific guess is correct about the cause of 
> the flare, a hood will do nothing, since the cause is mechanical and 
> internal, not optical.  It's interesting to compare a lens like the 
> Contax 90mm Sonnar G, with has really outstanding flare control, to 
> the Tri-Elmar.  The inner barrel of the Sonnar is jet black, with a 
> velvet lining.  NO light boucing around in there.
>
> When printing in black and white I typically had to use 1 full 
> contrast grade higher when the shot was taken in the 50mm setting.  
> Only  when the light was to my back, was the contrast close to the 
> 28mm or 35mm settings.
>
> By the way, to be fair, the 35mm setting was quite superb.  Nearly as 
> sharp as my Summicron and no distortion or flare.  That said, it's a 
> pretty expensive f 4.0 35mm lens.
>
> At the 28mm setting I found the resolution to be lower, distortion 
> very high and flare well controlled.  Sorry, now I am starting to 
> repeat myself.
>
> Dan States
>
>
>
>> From: Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au>
>> Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>> Subject: Re: [Leica]  The Tri-Elmar flare thing
>> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:41:06 +1000
>>
>> Thank you for this summary: Did you still have flare even when using 
>> a hood? I too have been taken aback by the flare problem, in 
>> situations where I was NOT expecting problems. The hood is very 
>> expensive and if this does not really help the problem, then my lens 
>> may go on sale as well.
>>
>> Cheers
>> On Saturday, Apr 26, 2003, at 10:17 Australia/Melbourne, Dan States 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry to rehash a subject, but I have been out of town for a few 
>>> days and did not get a chance to respond during the discussion about 
>>> the tri-elmar.
>>>
>>> Yes indeed, the Tri Elmar does have a flare problem.  In particular 
>>> at the 50mm setting.  I have a stack of slides that were trash 
>>> because of the unpredictable nature of this lens at the 50mm >>> setting.
>>>
>>> What was baffling to me was that the flare occured in shots that 
>>> would not normally be a problem for most modern lenses.
>>>
>>> I found that hazy/bright days gave the tri elmar fits.  The flare 
>>> was identical to that seen in the shots posted earlier on this 
>>> forum.  The character of the flare made me believe that it has to do 
>>> with reflections in the inner barrel of the lens, between element 
>>> and camera, not between lens elements themselves.  If you look into 
>>> the back of the TE while pointing it at a light source you can see 
>>> that a LOT of light reflects off the inner barrel in the 50mm 
>>> setting.  Little or none at the 28 or 35mm setting.  I also noticed 
>>> that the inner barrel is painted more of a flat grey than black, 
>>> when compared to my other Leica or Contax lenses.
>>>
>>> If this was an SLR lens you would be able to see the flare before 
>>> taking the shot...and correct for the situation by reframing or 
>>> changing magnification.  Since you can not see THROUGH the lens you 
>>> are left unaware until you get the ruined shots back.
>>>
>>> It was this nasty traight along with a ton of distortion at 28mm 
>>> that made me give up my TE.  The fact that these issues have not 
>>> been more of an issue with the LUG and especially with Erwin Puts  
>>> has suprised me.  How the TE is constantly refered to as one of 
>>> Leicas "best" really has me stumped.  Am I too picky?  Are most 
>>> users not seeing the problem in the snapshots they are getting back 
>>> from walmart?
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>> Dan States
>>> Grand Forks  (Americas wonderland) ND
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
>>> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe, see 
>>> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>>>
>>>
>> Alastair
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, see 
>> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
Alastair

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html