Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/04/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital Aesthetic
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:00:08 -0700
References: <004201c309b2$535c9170$0316fea9@ccasony01> <007f01c309d5$9a405fe0$9cad5018@gv.shawcable.net> <007301c309e5$0830ea10$0a01000a@basecamp2win> <001801c30a53$d88257d0$c3ac7fcb@ctl.creaf.com> <p0510031dbacdb6ae0681@[204.174.36.233]> <002b01c30a8a$b8d49510$0a01000a@basecamp2win>
>In the examples we've been talking about standard 35mm camera lenses on film
>vs DLSRs with small sensors, isn't the circle of confusion the same since
>the lenses are all designed to cover 24x36mm? The DSLR just crops the
>frame.
>
>--Jim
You would tend to use a slightly smaller circle of confusion since
the image has to be enlarged more for the same size print.
- --
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] OT - National Geographic film usage)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] OT - National Geographic film usage)
Message from "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com> ([Leica] Digital Aesthetic)
Message from "Red Dawn" <reddawn@singnet.com.sg> (Re: [Leica] Digital Aesthetic)
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Digital Aesthetic)
Message from "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com> (Re: [Leica] Digital Aesthetic)