Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] fired for photoshopping
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 14:54:41 -0500

Martin - If, as you suggest, the photographer had been 'screwing
around,' and tired and emotionally wiped out he had accidentally sent
the image to the paper, he would have deserved a reprimand, not firing.

I'm sorry, but in this case the responsibility is indeed the
photographer's, and not the paper's: the paper should be able to depend
upon the integrity of its staff members, and shouldn't have to blow
images up to the size of the World Trade Towers to see if the
photographer is screwing around.

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Martin
Howard
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:07 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] fired for photoshopping


Tina Manley wrote:

> Here is Walski's apology and the reaction from the Times:
>
> http://www.poynter.org/content/content_view.asp?id=28082

Again, this raises some interesting questions.  What if Walski had 
claimed that the photo was never meant to be sent off to the paper?  
What if he'd just been playing around with it for private purposes, and 
then sent a bunch of pictures from the wrong folder?  Perhaps some were 
obviously manipulated (Santa Claus riding across the sky in the 
background, the Easter Bunny brandishing an M16) while others were less 
so?  Would the responsibility lie with the photographer, the picture 
editor, or the person who wrote the obtuse interface to the software 
program used to upload the images?

Taking a systems view, it's clear that the *paper* (LA Times) screwed 
this one up.  After having read this article, it's much less clear that 
the sole responsibility lies with the photographer.

The "bad apple" theory is an easy one to grasp and provides the 
comforting illusion that the problem has been dealt with swiftly and 
efficiently.  A systems approach would consider the systemic 
vunerabilities and address those.

I'm not so sure any longer that firing the photographer was the right 
thing to do.

M.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html