Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35 Summilux from KEH, should I complain?
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 09:00:36 -0800
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030318224418.02a05eb8@192.168.100.11>

At 06:22 AM 3/19/2003 -0600, \(SonC\) Sonny Carter wrote:
>Richard, I don't think you need model releases unless you plan to get paid
>for the pictures, as long as the shots of school kids are "normal" shots.
>That is, as long as you aren't in France or Quebec, then you probably need
>another hobby than photography because of the quirky privacy laws.
>...

You guys are right, but my wife would throttle me due to privacy issues 
etc. So I guess I have to take pictures of inanimated Yosemite rocks or 
something :-)

re: oily aperture: I got a 85/2 for the OM that has oily aperture but it 
doesn't seem to affect picture quality. However, it's about 1/7 what I paid 
for the 'lux so thought I would ask. As I said, I will keep it, but now I 
need to find a hood, that concave front element looks sort of delicate :-)

Thanks!

// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> 
<http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>
On-line orders, support, and listservers available on web site.
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous 
replies in your msgs. ] 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com> (Re: [Leica] 35 Summilux from KEH, should I complain?)