Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Johhny The Japanese word you mean is "baka", not "bokeh". Jerry Johnny Deadman wrote: > and don't even get me onto the subject of Bush's fantastic bokeh, which > as everyone knows is connected to the Japanese root word meaning > 'dense', 'dull', or 'stupid'. > > On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 12:15 PM, Steve LeHuray wrote: > > >> It is a well known fact that the current version of Bush exhibits an > >> enhanced 'glow' when compared to the previous version. However on > >> close scrutiny this turns out to be a combination of distortion, a > >> narrow zone of focus, and a poor rendition of fine details, especially > >> when the aperture (or mouth) is wide open. > >> -- > >> John Brownlow > >> > > > > ...ha ha ha, I bet you are still sitting there chuckling to yourself > > after > > writing this little pearl. > > > > sl > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > > -- > John Brownlow > > http://www.pinkheadedbug.com > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html