Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] anti war in amsterdam
From: Mike Durling <durling@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 10:48:08 -0500
References: <65FB73DE-4137-11D7-9B6A-0003936CAC22@directvinternet.com> <000901c2d546$e65e6c50$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <3E4F1C41.7080000@cox.net> <001f01c2d595$e61c4150$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8>

I don't know.  I shoot maybe one roll of TMZ a year.  I have never been 
particularly happy with it.  It will definately give pretty good shadow 
detail at 1600 but I didn't like the tones and grain when I have used it.

I have had good results with Tri-X and Acufine at 1200 or so.  Contrast 
goes up but the look is nice.

Mike D

animal wrote:
> 
> p.s according Kodak literature the film should give better results then a
> 400 pushed twice.do you disagree with that?
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Matthew Powell <mlpowell@directvinternet.com> (Re: [Leica] Covering Anti-War protest in Philly)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] anti war in amsterdam)
Message from Mike Durling <durling@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] anti war in amsterdam)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] anti war in amsterdam)