Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Mystery Hektor 1:4/8.5 cm
From: Henrik Williams <henrik.williams@nordiska.uu.se>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 14:11:40 +0100

John Collier and Alastair Firkin offer a guess that "my" mystery Hektor
4/8.5 cm is really meant to refer to the Summarex 1.5/8.5 cm. It is of
course theoretically possible, but I find it hard to believe since only the
focus is identical. But the real crux (which I should have mentioned in my
first mail) is the price of th  lens, less than $100. The Summarex was
between three and four times more expensive!

Any other ideas?

Henrik Williams

>Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:53:15 -0700
>From: John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca>
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Mystery Hektor 1:4/8.5 cm
>Message-ID: <4576C7A5-2DAC-11D7-B8DF-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>
>References: 
>
>As there was a 1.5/85 Summarex (some early ones marked 1.5/90) may be 
>the catalogue writers made a mistake.
>
>John Collier
>
>On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, at 03:28 PM, Henrik Williams wrote:
>
>> Mystery Hektor 1:4/8.5 cm
>>
>> Have you ever heard of this Leica lens? I had not until I happened to
>> peruse a 1953 photo store catalogue from Wibergs fotografiska AB in
>> Stockholm, Sweden. Under the ad for the Leica IIIf there is a select 
>> list
>> of lenses to go with it, and as # 7 on this list: "Hektor 1:4/8,5 cm
>> ............................ 464:-"! The last part refers to the price 
>> in Swedish currency, "kronor" (crowns), the exchange rate at the time of 
>> which I do not know, but a guess would be 5 kronor to the dollar.
>> What on earth is this? I see only two alternatives:
>>
>> 1. The editor was confused and compiled a ghost lense from various
>> misunderstood information. The list does include the "Leitx Summarit
>> 1:1,5/5 cm" and the "Summikrom 1:2/5 cm", but on the other hand no 
>> really glaring mistakes, nor any incredible information in the rest of the
>> catalogue. And, where does the price of the lens come from?
>>
>> 2. There is some basis in real life for this information. At the very 
>> end of the list, as item # 10, appears the already mentioned "Summikrom 
>> 1:2/5 cm ............................. 586:-". This is the classic
Summicron, introduced this very year. Could the "Hektor 1:4/8,5 cm" be
another 
>> lense, about to be introduced? The data of the lense are highly
suspicious: 
>> What would be the need for a lense so close in specification to the Elmar 
>> 1:4/9 cm? This latter lens is sold for 290 kronor. However, when the
>> collapsible(!) Elmar 1:4/9 cm was sold later its price was 465 kronor
>> (according to another, 1956 catalogue), or remarkably close to the 
>> price of this 1953 mystery lens. Leitz did indeed sometime advertize
lenses that were never actually produced for sale, for example the pre-war 
>> "snap-shot" Elmar 1:4.5/3.5 cm. The collapsible Elmar 1:4/9 cm was
introduced in 1954, but only in a bayonet mount. Could there have been
plans to sell this lens with a different specification and (also?) in a
screw (lens thread) mount?
>> I certainly do not know. Leitz did experiment with this lens even 
>> before the war, but appearantly always under the designation Elmar 9 cm
(e.g. James L. Lager. Leica: An Illustrated History. Volume II - Lenses p. 
>> 131) which certainly speaks against my quess.

__________________________________________________________
Henrik Williams
Professor i nordiska språk
Institutionen för nordiska språk
Box 527
751 20 UPPSALA
Telefon: 018-471 12 75, 018-46 31 46 (hem), 0733-90 86 30 (mobil)
Fax: 018-471 12 72
E-post: henrik.williams@nordiska.uu.se
__________________________________________________________
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Stephen Gandy <LeicaNikon@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Mystery Hektor 1:4/8.5 cm)