Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] niagra falls
From: "faneuil" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:22:10 -0500
References: <20030122145753.GA6119@panix.com>

Rei-

As always - great shots.
A question :
I have been testing Fuji 1600 neopan. At 1600 my results are very grainy and
contrasty. I like your results at EI800. Does this mean you are compensating
for overexposure in the development?

Eric

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Rei Shinozuka" <shino@panix.com>
To: "Leica Users Group (LUG)" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:57 AM
Subject: [Leica] niagra falls


> a mix of leica images and some others i made on a trip the
> family took last november to the canadian side of niagra falls.
>
> http://www.shinozuka-family.com/niagra1
> http://www.shinozuka-family.com/niagra2
>
> (i am about one year behind scanning... randomly catching up.)
>
> -rei
>
> --
> Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
> Ridgewood, New Jersey
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
Reply from Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
In reply to: Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> ([Leica] niagra falls)