Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 50/1.5 Summarit LTM
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:36:39 -0800
References: <001f01c2b12c$48028fc0$02000003@dnai.com> <5.2.0.9.0.20030106211624.02de6e78@mail.msy.bellsouth.net>

Jeff

A Summarit is nothing but a coated Xenon.  However, since a Xenon
has TEN glass to air surfaces, it is an enormous improvement.

When you had it cleaned and "de-fungus'd", did you have it recoated?

Xenons always had superb bokeh, before I knew what bokeh was.

Jerry

"Jeffery L. Smith" wrote:

> I bought a badly fungused 50/1.5 Summarit that I had cleaned by FocalPoint.
> Other than that, it is pristine (had the original Leitz UV filter on it
> which had probably never been removed. However, since it was out being
> cleaned for months, I never got into the swing of shooting with it.
>
> Anyone out there who can give me some background (characteristics) of this
> lens. My Leica M book suggests that it was an improvement over its
> predecessor, but isn't up to Summilux standards. I've never seen so many
> diaphragm blades on a lens, so I assume that the bokeh won't look like the
> Pentagon.
>
> What are this lens's strongest points?
>
> Jeffery Smith
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com> ([Leica] Canon B adapter)
Message from "Jeffery L. Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net> ([Leica] 50/1.5 Summarit LTM)