Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digital versus film
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:47:18 -0600
References: <05C52C10-1205-11D7-921D-000393AC0E1A@johnbrownlow.com>

Show us a picture of your stunna.

Johnny Deadman wrote:

>
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 02:32 PM, Steve LeHuray wrote:
>
>>>> Yes Austin, I have heard that is all true, except for the 6'2" 
>>>> part, Brits
>>>> never get that tall, lack of sunshine ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> Steve,
>>>
>>> Well, I'm in NEW England, not England... ;-)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Austin
>>>
>>
>> ....oh, excuse! well are you saying Johnny is short and stout?? ;+)
>
>
> Well, I feel tall and thin when I go to Liverpool and Glasgow, where 
> people are short and fat, short and thin in the mid-west, where people 
> are tall and fat, and short and fat in LA and NYC where people are 
> tall and thing. However I am indeed very clever, rich and charming, 
> and Mrs Deadman is a stunna.
>
> -- 
> Johnny Deadman (5'10, 182)
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Johnny Deadman <lists@johnbrownlow.com> (Re: [Leica] digital versus film)