Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim, > 300mb files This is a very generous size. :-) Are they from 35mm film or medium format ? and do you post-process these files ? - - Phong > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jim Brick > Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 3:44 PM > > My 20x24 & 30x40 optical prints are sharper (they're dead sharp!) than the > same film, scanned on a Tango drum scanner (300mb files), and printed on a > LightJet printer. The optical prints look "alive". The LightJet prints look > very good, but there is a telling difference. Of course (and not to start > another argument) the LightJet prints are on Fuji Crystal Archive (RA4 > process) paper and the optical prints are Cibachrome Classic. > > JMHPE (Just My Humble Personal Experience), > > :-) > > Jim > > > At 02:23 PM 12/8/2002 -0500, Austin Franklin wrote: > > > From my experience, this isn't even right. I get sharper, more detailed, > >prints from scanning film and printing on my inkjet printer with Piezo inks, > >than I got from chemical prints...and yes, I used very high end glass > >(Schneider) and printed from Hasselblad negatives. At least this is true > >for me for B&W. I don't really do any color. > > > >Austin > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html