Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 47: I got my 21mm lens!
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 08:53:16 +0100
References: <07697691-FF36-11D6-BD5C-000393802534@mac.com>

Hi Martin,

Do you mean there is a lot of flare? I did use the built-in shade, but 
of course with a 21mm lens the shade is by necessity skimpy. But I do 
not find that flare is a big problem with these images, even though I 
purposely challenged the lens with a lot of backlit shots.

Nathan

Martin Howard wrote:
> 
> I'm surprised at the level of flare in those 21mm pictures.  Were you 
> using a shade?
> 
> M.
> 
> On Saturday, Nov 23, 2002, at 13:55 America/Los_Angeles, Nathan Wajsman 
> wrote:
> 
>> My pictures for week 47 have little in common other than they were all 
>> taken with my newly acquired Voigtlander 21mm lens. 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> 


- -- 
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
mobile: +41 78 732 1430

Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <mvhoward@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 47: I got my 21mm lens!)