Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
>On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Rafael Alday wrote:
>
>> Thank you all for your advices.
>> I visited the www.cameraquest.com and Stephen Gandy says that Elmar is not
>> very sharp lens and Hektor chrome (coated) is not a very good lens (prone to
>> fogging). I have the posibility to buy a Late Canon 135 3.5 lens (not
>> senerar but later version) for 150 $ in mint condition.
>> Following Stephen Gandy recommendation the best 135mm SM lenses are Nikon
>> and Canon
>> Any experiences with this lens,
>
>Why do you want to buy a Screwmount-lens for your M6? The answers given to
>you were of course M-mount lenses... and even Stephen Gandy says things
>like "Outstanding performance, very popular, long lived lens" about
>the Tele-Elmar 4/135. I own one of these, and can't add anything to this
>statement... it is an outstanding, razor sharp and contrasty lens.
>
>Martin
And you will almost certainly get your $$$ back in a few years anyway
Cheers
- --
Alastair Firkin
http://www.afirkin.com
http://www.familyofman2.com
()" "'()
( '0',)
(,,)(")(")
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html