Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT Neopan 1600 developers
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:43:55 +0100
References: <A01060006-1022-AA29A935F7ED11D68B22003065C7DF66@[10.0.1.2]>

Adam,

I follow the Jobo recommendation which is that with XTOL, a pre-soak is 
not needed. So I save the 5 minutes and omit it. I have tried it a 
couple of times but see no difference in practice.

Nathan

Adam Bridge wrote:

> 
> Are you using a pre-soak? I note that the JOBO site says their times were
> derived without a pre-soak, but someone, I think on here, said they always use a
> pre-soak because it helps buffer the effects of the continuous agitation.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Adam Bridge
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> 


- -- 
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
mobile: +41 78 732 1430

Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] OT Neopan 1600 developers)