Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have always shot Neopan 1600 straight at 1600 and have never had a problem. Gerry Gerry Walden LRPS www.gwpics.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Mark Rabiner Sent: 06 November 2002 19:58 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] OT Neopan 1600 developers Rei Shinozuka wrote: > > i think anchell and troop actually rate neopan 1600 at 640-800, saying its > basically a modified 400ASA film. my only problem with NP 1600 > is for DX cameras like my T2 and T3, i need to get those DX sitckers. > i know you can dial in exposure compensation to do the same, but i'm a > purist and i don't want to have my t3 always have a [+] sign in its LCD. > so i carry a few DX stickers in my T3 outfit (and you can reuse them with > a little care). i also have 1600 stickers for when i use D3200. > > -rei > Not trying to be contentious, Rei, but i thought i knew my A&T backwards and forward could you give me a page number on that Neopan being a modified 400 ASA film and really being 640-800? This destroys my world! A lot of people i know are shooting it at 1600 and got having any problems with thin shadows at all! Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.markrabiner.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html