Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, the gritty, harsh thing ... and I don't feel I'm getting the smooth greys that I know are in the negative. Perhaps I should just learn how to scan with it :) The negatives will produce smooth (in contrast to harsh) prints ... And one strip (the Epson 2450 has a loader for strips of 6) ... one strip it refused to find the individual frames. It might be because the M3 spaces the frames very very tight. At times it's impossible to clip the negatives properly. Thanks for your comments, Mark. I thought of you when I pulled out the 50mm Elmar 2.8 (the old one). I now just keep it on. Makes for a decent pocket camera (in the winter here in the north, where we tend to carry around heavy coats from about now until next July). All the best, Daniel On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Mark Pope wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > At the risk of kyboshing your bid for a new film scanner...what's the > problem with these? They look sharp, have plenty of contrast and detail. > Maybe a bit 'gritty' or harsh. > > > Mark Pope > Swindon Wilts, UK > > http://www.monomagic.co.uk > http://www.leica-gallery.net/mark-pope > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Ridings" <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 2:40 PM > Subject: [Leica] PAW 41 > > > > PAW 41 is up. > > > > http://geocities.com/daniel_ridings/paw/41.html > > > > Not getting good results from Epson 2450 with B&W negs. Looks like I'll be > > replacing the film scanner after all. My wife says I should take some good > > pictures first ... > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html