Re: [Leica] Re: scanner answer

[Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com>]

That's right Mehrdad... you're in Chicago if I remember correctly, just
hop on over to Detroit. :>)

Jim - http://www.hemenway.com




Mehrdad Sadat wrote:
> 
> I really liked the idea of the 120 roll scan and i was looking for such
> thing myself as i was scanning a bunch 645 chorms that took for ever. on the
> other hand, may be i get job where roy works
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Regards, Mehrdad
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jim
> Hemenway
> Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 6:50 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: scanner answer
> 
> Hey, look! This is great!
> 
> They're only 35,000.00 UK Pounds, ($54,792.50).
> 
> I think I'll order a pair, one for color and one for B&W, (so that I
> won't be inconvenienced by having to remember to disable ICE).
> 
> :>)
> 
> Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
> 
> http://www.ephotozine.com/news/fullnews.cfm/NewsID/750
> 
> Roy Feldman wrote:
> >
> > is there a film scanner that will take in 120 film
> > in a full
> > roll  of 12 images and scan it automatically as well as 35mm
> > roll of 36
> > images?  something that requires essentially no user
> > intervention....... but
> > must do both 120 and 35mm.... ???
> > Answer- Yes we have one at work, the Kodak HR 500, will do up to 120 mg
> > scans and does a roll of 120 on about 40 seconds.
> >
> 
> Mehrdad Sadat wrote:
> >
> > roy, how much does something like this cost? also i just checked kodak
> site
> > it say only under 70 mb for 6x4.5 so is the 128 for 6x9? also how is the
> > quality of the scans and what is the dpi
> >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html