Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] A tree falls in Natchitoches
From: Jeffery Smith <JLS@runbox.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 09:09:02 -0500
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020921172256.00b1eab8@pop.runbox.com>

That's how science works...something is the truth, the whole truth, and 
nothing but the truth until we decide something else is actually the truth.

JLS

At 10:43 PM 9/21/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>Actually they do not know how a tree gets water from the roots all the way 
>up. There are two main theories of which transpiration is currently in 
>vogue. Transpiration is supposed to be the engine that "sucks" the water 
>up. The other theory involves the roots pumping the water up. However 
>there is no actual proof either way and it would not surprise me to find 
>out we are wrong on both counts. At times it amazes me how much we do not 
>know about seemingly simple life forms we take for granted.
>
>John Collier
>
>On Saturday, September 21, 2002, at 04:36 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>
>>"The tree sucked up water..."
>>
>>Oh dear. A biological and physical impossibility. You DO need to speak 
>>the Northwestern's resident botanist. The water is taken into the roots 
>>by osmosis, and then carried up the rest of the way through transpiration.
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: A tree falls in Natchitoches)
In reply to: Message from Jeffery Smith <JLS@runbox.com> (Re: [Leica] A tree falls in Natchitoches)