Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Two weeks from a plagiarism charge
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 13:22:35 -0700
References: <002f01c25af4$42d3ebe0$f05b063e@desktop> <002f01c25af4$42d3ebe0$f05b063e@desktop> <v04011700b9a9555c4e10@[66.81.74.216]>
 
Yes, it most certainly has been applied to photography. The best source
for past and current cases is Photo District News, which keeps track of
litigations and copyright protections. 
Slobodan Dimitrov


Guy Bennett wrote:
> 
> One and all:
> 
> Does the term "plagiarism" apply to photography (and other visual arts), or
> is it strictly used for writing?
> 
> I always assumed the latter, but am now a-wondering.
> 
> Just curious.
> 
> Guy
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from "geebeespaw" <geebeespaw@btopenworld.com> ([Leica] Two weeks from a plagiarism charge)
Message from "geebeespaw" <geebeespaw@btopenworld.com> ([Leica] Two weeks from a plagiarism charge)
Message from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Two weeks from a plagiarism charge)