Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]They're both nicely done, but it is a bit of a time-worn theme. But this takes me back to my original critique of your photography a couple of weeks ago, Graham: the magazine photo makes a much stronger statement, partly due to the use of contrasty printing as a way of establishing the photographer's point of view. It is more expressive. R. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "geebeespaw" <geebeespaw@btopenworld.com> To: "LUG" <Leica-Users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 9:07 AM Subject: [Leica] Two weeks from a plagiarism charge > If any new UK viewers stumbles on this photograph: > http://www.geebeephoto.com/html/gal4_12.html > > > I want to let them know that it was posted well before this photograph in > the October 2002 edition of Practical Photography which hit the stands > yesterday: > http://www.geebeephoto.com/html/irc.html > > and yes, I know his is better :-) > > > Graham > http://geebeephoto.com > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html