Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, George Lottermoser wrote: > John Nebelnebel@csdco.com (John Nebel)9/4/023:03 PM > > >http://www.money.org/plat_sect_sinar.tiff (original image 192mb - > >direct > >electronic image) > > > >http://www.money.org/plat_sect_film.tiff (original image 465mb - 8x10 > >Astia scanned at 2000 dpi) > > Quite surprised that the film looks sharper than sinar. Were either or > both sharpened in the work flow? > > George > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > Both were sharpened slightly. The film should be sharper than the Sinar given the resolution implied by the file sizes above. Sinar = 8k x 8k pixels, Creo = 6" x 2kdpi = 12k x 12k pixels. I did save the files with both .tif and .tiff extensions after seeing some software/platform combinations choke on .tiff. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html