Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2002/08/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...
From: "Doug Lee" <drlee9@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 08:17:41 -0400
References: <000401c23c75$12a8d590$2002a8c0@SAM> <006101c23c82$7bfd2d40$94a6fea9@3zlwb> <451914640.1028577072@sparky> <005701c23d29$cc4c6f70$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8>
Thank you. I feel less confused. (Not that it matters!)
I was just flipping through a photography book and saw a photo of a D1.
Looks a whole lot like an F5 to me. Now, perhaps it is "based" on an F100,
but its body style is defintely F5ish.
Now, does anyone recall why we were discussing this? (-;
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 5:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't
really...
> In your hands the D1,s feel like the F5 they have a taller frame
> brgds simon jessurun
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> ([Leica] WAS:For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...WHO CARES!)
In reply to:
Message from "Sam Krneta" <skrneta@mindspring.com> (RE: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...)
Message from "Doug Lee" <drlee9@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] For anyone who still thinks that digital isn't really...)