Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] TE and prime lenses
From: "C. W. Satterfield" <cwsat@istate.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 08:03:58 -0500
References: <20020725045818.48237.qmail@web11107.mail.yahoo.com>

Isn't the TE, the tele-elmarit and the 3E the tri-elmar?

Darrell Jennings wrote:

>Like everyone else that has replyed, I kept my prime
>lenses (35 f1.4 and 50 Noctilux). The TE gave me a 28
>(which I didn't have), but mainly gave me portability
>and speed (by not having to change lenses). If I
>didn't have the prime lenses, the TE might be used to
>get me by, but there are times when you have to have
>speed and the TE sure is slow. DJ
>--- Oliver Bryk <oliverbryk@attbi.com> wrote:
>
>>Did users of prime lenses in the focal lengths of
>>the Tri-Elmar, who later
>>bought a TE, continue to use these prime lenses or
>>sell them?
>>Oliver Bryk
>>Norton AntiVirus scans all my outgoing e-mail.
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, see
>>
>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
>http://health.yahoo.com
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Darrell Jennings <darrell_jennings@yahoo.com> (Re: [Leica] TE and prime lenses)