Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] TE and prime lenses
From: Darrell Jennings <darrell_jennings@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 21:58:18 -0700 (PDT)

Like everyone else that has replyed, I kept my prime
lenses (35 f1.4 and 50 Noctilux). The TE gave me a 28
(which I didn't have), but mainly gave me portability
and speed (by not having to change lenses). If I
didn't have the prime lenses, the TE might be used to
get me by, but there are times when you have to have
speed and the TE sure is slow. DJ
- --- Oliver Bryk <oliverbryk@attbi.com> wrote:
> Did users of prime lenses in the focal lengths of
> the Tri-Elmar, who later
> bought a TE, continue to use these prime lenses or
> sell them?
> Oliver Bryk
> Norton AntiVirus scans all my outgoing e-mail.
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "C. W. Satterfield" <cwsat@istate.net> (Re: [Leica] TE and prime lenses)