Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi B.D., Er, and cropping is not an option ;-) I believe if you've got the 90, you also need the 50, but with the 75, you don't. Again, the 35/75 combo is simply outstanding for my use. Regards, Austin > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of B. D. Colen > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 1:51 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] Don't do it > > > It is faster, and it does have a better look...but it doesn't get > you close enough when close enough is what's important...which is > why it's worth having the 90 in your bag... > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Austin > Franklin > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 1:29 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] Don't do it > > > > > As wonderful as the 75 is, George, with the work you do you're going > > to come to curse the day you dumped the 90. You will quickly come to > > realize that the 75 is really just a gorgeous 50 1.4 on mild steroids - > > it gives you about a half-step, to a step, of reach, while the 90 really > > brings the subject closer. Take it from one who's been there, done > > that - and had to buy another 90.;-) > > Personally, it's the bokeh of the 75 that I like FAR better than > the 90, and it's faster... I had both, dumped the 90. > > Austin > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html