Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Black and White Magazine
From: Darrell Jennings <darrell_jennings@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 18:43:57 -0700 (PDT)

I understand Rei, however if a magazine is about Black
and White photography I would think it would cover all
aspects of black and white photography. 

The lines between digital and film are already
blurred. A good example being use of digital to print
negatives for wet dark room contact printing (enabling
35mm film for platinum printing). 

I take B&W and don't expect that I will like or read
everything in it. I also recognize that what I am
intested in today may be very different than what I am
interested in next year. I think it is a big mistake
to ignore a whole area of black and white photography
in a magazine on black and white photography. The
descrimination on Peizography reminds me of the days
not so long ago when photography was considered a
craft, not an art and was excluded from galleries...




- --- Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> wrote:
> restricting the scope of one's interest ought not
> automatically
> be misconstrued as bigotry, luddism, or ignorance. 
> i am personally
> not interested in digital at this time because
> photography is my
> avocation, and working with computers outside of my
> vocation is
> in no way appealing to me.  thus i am naturally far
> more interested
> in analog photographic processes and results than in
> other forms of 
> media.
> 
> -rei
> 
> 
> > From: Darrell Jennings
> <darrell_jennings@yahoo.com>
> > 
> > I don't understand how they can ignore
> Peizography.  I
> > have a platinum print and one of the same shot
> done
> > with Peizotone inks and there is NO
> comparison...the
> > Peizotone ink print is better. They (B&W) do show
> > great work, and are beautifully produced, but
> ignoring
> > digital B&W is sticking your head in the sand. 
> > 
> > Film and digital don't really matter to me. What
> > matters is the end product. I don't personally own
> a
> > digital camera of any kind, but I'd own one
> quickly if
> > it let me work in the formats and lenses I own
> today
> > and produce results as good as or better than film
> and
> > scanner or film and wet dark room. When and if
> they
> > bring out a digital M I'll buy it.  When they get
> a
> > 12shot or greater digital back for a Hasselblad
> for a
> > few thousand dollars that is as small light and
> > portable as a film back I'll buy it. 
> > 
> > Arguing about digital, ignoring it, or banning it
> is
> > pretty foolish IMHO. 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
> Ridgewood, New Jersey
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html