Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Phong wrote: > YEA! They were probably able to win because a judge was realistic enough to > see that the search was carried to far. > > The Second Amendment of the Constitution protects us from unreasonable > searches and seizures under both criminal and civil law. > Roland, This must be a trivial lapse on your part. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution is the RKBA, not about search and seizure, and due process. - - - Phong ======================================================================== I can see some logic in it, though. If he is searched and happens to be "packing iron", they have no right to confiscate it (2nd. Amendment). However, they are entitled to say some pretty strong things about it (1st. Amendment), to which he is not obliged to respond (5th. Amendment). ;-) Regards, ===== Ray "The trouble with resisting temptation is you never know when you'll get another chance!" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html