Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Amtrak - apology
From: "Mitch Zeissler" <zeissler@directvinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 20:53:02 -0400

Seth...

Apology accepted.  Thank you.  I did not intend to push any buttons.

/Mitch
_________________________________________
Mitch Zeissler
  E-mail: zeissler@directvinternet.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Mitch
> Zeissler
> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 4:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Amtrak - long rebuttal
> From: SthRosner@aol.com
> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 17:13:53 EDT
>
> Mitch, you are entitled to my apologies for some of what I wrote
> and you have
> them. Clearly I made some assumptions that were incorrect and
> being as fond
> of long distance train travel, it irks me no end that Amtrak
> takes a lot of
> heat for much stuff that is not its fault.
>
> Most obvious example is the way that the freight railroads, who
> turned over
> their money-losing passenger service to Amtrak with the government's
> permission on the promise that they would provide adequate rail access to
> Amtrak trains, routinely put Amtrak trains on siding to wait
> while they run
> their freight trains through. So of course they're late. There are other
> issues but LUGGERS have been bored enough with my train stuff.
>
> That said, Mitch, there was no excuse for the tone or some of the
> criticism
> of my email and both I and my navel are sorry.
>
> Best,
>
> Seth            LaK 9


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html