Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] airport security kinda long. ;-) - Now very OT
From: "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 21:27:03 -0700
References: <DAEOKOEHIBMMGOJNOFECKEHEDGAA.phong@doan-ltd.com>

You're right.   But, at least I was close.

Roland Smith
Oakland, California
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Phong" <phong@doan-ltd.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] airport security kinda long. ;-) - Now very OT


> From: "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com>
> >  YEA!  They were probably able to win because a judge was realistic
enough to
> >  see that the search was carried to far.
> >
> >  The Second Amendment of the Constitution protects us from unreasonable
> >  searches and seizures under both criminal and civil law.
> >
>
> Roland,
> This must be a trivial lapse on your part.  The Second Amendment of the US
> Constitution is the RKBA, not about search and seizure, and due process.
>
> - Phong
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Phong" <phong@doan-ltd.com> (Re: [Leica] airport security kinda long. ;-) - Now very OT)