Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: FOM 2/year 2
From: Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 20:13:22 -0400
References: <72679900-8EDC-11D6-A090-003065D4DE46@sohogurus.net>

- --On Wednesday, July 3, 2002 7:27 PM -0400 Allan Wafkowski 
<allan@sohogurus.net> wrote:

> Alastair, I hope you won't judge what I have said by what others' have
> said I said. My words mean what they mean, and no more.
>
> I can join those who have thanked you for your efforts with FOM2. For two
> years you've worked on this, and I understand that it is no small effort.
> I've stated how I think it could be improved, and I believe my intentions
> were not at all as crass as some have made them out to be. You will hold
> the course as you see fit. I have no problem with that. Some "defenders"
> of FOM2 (I really don't believe Ted's screeds were a defense at all)
                                        ^^^^^^^
> think it's disloyal to have a dissenting opinion. I of course don't hold
> that position. I am surprised at the animosity in some of the emails,
> both public and private. Colin went as far as to send me a private email
> stating: "BTW your pictures suck." Boy! Talk about low-blow!
>
> In any case, I hope you will consider my submissions without prejudice if
> I can come up with some that don't "suck." :)

Well and good, but what the hell is a screed?

- --
Rolfe Tessem
rolfe@ldp.com
Lucky Duck Productions, Inc.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: FOM 2/year 2)
In reply to: Message from Allan Wafkowski <allan@sohogurus.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: FOM 2/year 2)