Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] To M7 or not to M7, c'est la question - LONG
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 13:39:44 -0400

Breathlessly? I don't think so.;-)

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of
SthRosner@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:01 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] To M7 or not to M7, c'est la question - LONG


In a message dated 7/2/02 12:30:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
simon@sclamb.com
writes:

> My original question was most certainly not a lame attempt at rib-poking
>  humor!

Simon, I know that. Your question was entirely appropriate. The
back-and-forth we've had on the M7 simply gave me the opening to unlimber
some heavyweight - read heavy-handed - humor, if that's what it was.
Certainly not intended to offend anyone at all; this has been a very
illuminating colloquy on a camera we've all been breathlessly waiting for.
And the beat goes on.

Seth      LaK 9

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Paul Chefurka <paul@chefurka.com> (Re: [Leica] To M7 or not to M7, c'est la question - LONG)