Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] critique
From: Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 07:28:56 -0400
References: <EC1D893EF5042348ADC8A79B742E9EFB6D8FD5@GCI-MOCEX01.us.ad.gannett.com> <002301c217dd$efab7e00$6501a8c0@winona1.mn.home.com> <3D115840.E0D15095@webshuttle.ch>

I make mine 700 across.
- -- 
Jim - http://www.hemenway.com



Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> I run at 1024x768 which I believe is at the lower end of the readership here. So
> assuming that my own setup is the lowest common denominator, I always size my
> pictures so that they are 750 pixels across for horizontal shots (the height
> then falls somewhere around 500), or 600 pixels tall for vertical shots
> (resulting in a width of about 400). This leaves just sufficient space for the
> browser menus at the top and on the left and does not force the viewer to scroll
> around the image.
> 
> Nathan
> 
> Tom Smart wrote:
> 
> > What are we thinking is a better size for critique?  I was thinking 384
> > pixels on the vertical dimensions fits it onto screens with 640x480
> > resolution, but larger than that makes some people scroll to see the full
> > size.  My own monitor is 1280x1024, but what is standard these days.  Thanks
> > to all for the comments.
> >
> > Tom
> 
> --
> Nathan Wajsman
> Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland
> 
> e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
> mobile: +41 78 732 1430
> 
> Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm
> General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Zeissler, Mitch" <mzeissle@gannett.com> (RE: [Leica] critique)
Message from "Tom Smart" <tom@sleepytom.com> (Re: [Leica] critique)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] critique)