Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Not having contributed in a while
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 13:41:24 -0400

Thanks...That's sure a comparison I can live with, even if I can't live up
to it...I'd better keep my negs out of "impregnable" bank vaults...;-)

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jeffery
Smith
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 10:46 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Not having contributed in a while


I hope it was the 85/1.4; I have an 85/1.4 Planar that I hope can emulate
that shot when I use it as a people lens.

I like the genre that you're pursuing. Sort of reminds me of the B&W JFK
images. Good work.

Jeff

> Thanks for the good questions, Jeff - First, the bad news....the portrait
of
> Chloe was shot with either - I honestly can't remember - the Nikon 60 2.8
AF
> D macro, or the Nikon 85 1.4 AF D - my guess is the 85.
>
> As to the question about how I work....other than a couple of occasions
when
> I have asked two subjects to push their heads together, I don't ever give
> instructions to subjects when doing this kind of shooting. In fact, when
> some starts to step in front of me, realizes I'm shooting, and hesitates
and
> apologizes, I ask them to ignore me and just do what they were doing. I do
> find that I - or at least my cameras - become transparent. When I spent
the
> day with Chloe and her parents I certainly chatted with her parents, but
> that chatting helps make me part of the background. I find I can then
chat,
> with the camera to my eye, and shoot, without having the subject react to
> the camera.
>
> As to the stuff of Gary Hall, because there were some specific kinds of
> shots the client wanted, I had to ask him to go swimming - pretty ironic
> ;-) - and I also had to ask him to do some butterfly laps, as he normally
> doesn't swim the butterfly - ever. In fact, he joked about the fact that
> with all the zillions of times he's been photographed, I'm "the only
> photographer in the world" to have shots of him swimming the butterfly.
(NO,
> I don't think that's a claim to fame - I just think it's funny.)
>
> Like you, I've had people tell me to get lost, so I get lost - very
briefly.
> Weddings are a different kind of animal from what I usually do. While they
> are certainly family events, they are MUCH higher in tension, and much
more
> alcohol fueled, than most family gatherings I'd be photographing.;-)
>
> B. D.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jeffery
> Smith
> Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 5:28 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Not having contributed in a while
>
>
> B.D.,
>
> Nice "day in the life" series. How difficult is it to make yourself
> transparent in these assignments? Do you slip around without talking much,
> or is there interaction with the subjects (as in "hold it! keep doing what
> you're doing" etc.)? When I was doing some candid stuff of grooms and
their
> ushers, etc. getting ready for a wedding, I kept my mouth shut and just
> sort of puttered around with a 105/2.5 Nikkor. Even this, some of the guys
> would tell me to get lost (a tad hung over from the night before).
>
> You seem to be using several different lenses. What did you use for the
> first portrait of the child whose eye is in razor sharp focus?
>
> Jeffery Smith
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html