Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: [Fwd: scanner]
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 17:31:18 -0700
References: <3CF7DBEF.888E5B51@earthlink.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20020531162645.0460de50@pop.alink.net>

Thanks Jim. 
Slobodan Dimitrov

Jim Brick wrote:
> 
> I would guess, detail in deep shadows or dark subjects. Leica lenses are
> notorious for recording a scene's deepest darkest secrets. And consumer
> scanners have no way of recording this.
> 
> IMHO,
> 
> :)
> 
> Jim
> 
> At 06:42 PM 5/31/2002 -0400, Austin Franklin wrote:
> 
> > > As far as I'm concerned there is nothing compatible with what I get from
> > > my Leica optics, even as close as some other product might come. That
> > > missing 5-10% from brand X is glaring, and unacceptable.
> > > Slobodan Dimitrov
> >
> >Slobodan,
> >
> >WHAT do you believe is missing?  What SPECIFIC aspect of a scanner is not
> >sufficient for your images?  I am looking for a specific technical aspect
> >that you claim a current midrange+ scanner doesn't "get" from your Leica
> >images.
> >
> >Austin
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] [Fwd: scanner])
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] RE: [Fwd: scanner])