Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Week 22 PAW posted
From: "Will" <wlarsen@ocsnet.net>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 20:50:00 -0700
References: <20020528181819.64279.qmail@web20509.mail.yahoo.com> <3CF3E205.5786FEE6@markrabiner.com>

Jeez, Mark, what kind of file sizes can you accept?

Most of us can accept the size Bill posted.  But get much
beyond that and you  can eliminate the folks on dial-up and
other low level interfaces.  And most of us who post are not
willing to give you the file size necessary to print quality
on a local printer.

Rabiner writes:
|
| There is Zero sense of the quality of the image on the
neg.
|
| This is why i vote for the option of larger scans. It
certainly makes
| sense in the context of the Leica Users Group. Here we are
a bunch of
| people interested in producing images which are a cut
above the rest.

Piss off on our larger scans


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] Week 22 PAW posted)
In reply to: Message from Bill Clough <bill_clough@yahoo.com> (Re: [Leica] Week 22 PAW posted)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] Week 22 PAW posted)