Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: GT40
From: Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 20:52:48 -0400
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJMEOCAEAB.darkroom@ix.netcom.com> <200205241859.g4OIxxQ07432@panix2.panix.com> <od5teuojnqd4i8ejjjtm2ha6hnj8f7tlgg@4ax.com> <00ca01c20361$28b7f250$2f0010ac@longitude.com> <4mateu84g553mbjtrkhpp8uhmb3rdjjn22@4ax.com>

Chuckle, at first I thought you had two BMW's!
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Chefurka" <paul@chefurka.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: GT40


> On Fri, 24 May 2002 16:25:34 -0400, "charles walden"
<charlie@highhill.com>
> wrote:
>
> >glad to see another 540i user - it's the only other mechanical device I
> >enjoy as much as my m3 on a daily basis.
> >
> >charlie
>
> Yup - they're both examples of fully realized engineering.  I'd say that
> they're completely self-actualized devices, but that would be
> anthropomorphizing them, and they hate it when you do that...
>
> Paul
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] Re: GT40)
Message from "Rei Shinozuka" <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: GT40)
Message from Paul Chefurka <paul@chefurka.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: GT40)
Message from "charles walden" <charlie@highhill.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: GT40)
Message from Paul Chefurka <paul@chefurka.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: GT40)