Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2002/05/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: GT40
From: Paul Chefurka <paul@chefurka.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 17:08:47 -0400
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJMEOCAEAB.darkroom@ix.netcom.com> <200205241859.g4OIxxQ07432@panix2.panix.com> <od5teuojnqd4i8ejjjtm2ha6hnj8f7tlgg@4ax.com> <00ca01c20361$28b7f250$2f0010ac@longitude.com>
On Fri, 24 May 2002 16:25:34 -0400, "charles walden" <charlie@highhill.com>
wrote:
>glad to see another 540i user - it's the only other mechanical device I
>enjoy as much as my m3 on a daily basis.
>
>charlie
Yup - they're both examples of fully realized engineering. I'd say that
they're completely self-actualized devices, but that would be
anthropomorphizing them, and they hate it when you do that...
Paul
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: GT40)
In reply to:
Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] Re: GT40)
Message from "Rei Shinozuka" <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: GT40)
Message from Paul Chefurka <paul@chefurka.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: GT40)
Message from "charles walden" <charlie@highhill.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: GT40)