Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
>At 09:33 AM 5/20/02 +0200, you wrote:
>
>>I find all these testing results very odd. Chasseur d'Images has tested the
>>Panasonic camera and came to the conclusion that it is an excellent camera,
>>with flattering picture quality.
>>
>>Odd. Very odd.
>>
>>Pascal
>>NO ARCHIVE
>
>
>I find it very odd, too. I have had nothing but excellent results
>from my Panasonic and am anxiously waiting for the Leica version
>which Leica, USA, assures me will ship the first week in June. The
>only quality problem I have had with the Panasonic is grainy photos
>at the 400 ISO setting. In fact, the photos on the two review sites
>look like mine when I use the 400 ISO rating. The 100 ISO rating
>photos are excellent.
That could explain it. There was no mention of the iso rating used. I
will await the real test -- when Tina tells me its OK ;-)
- --
Alastair Firkin
http://www.afirkin.com
http://www.familyofman2.com
()" "'() ()" "() ()" "()
( '0',) ( '0' ) ( '0', )
(,,)(")(") (")(") (")(")(,)
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html