Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>On 20-05-2002 07:00 Allan Wafkowski wrote: > >> It's difficult to understand how this happened. Granted, some of the >> testing procedures are extreme--really, how many people blow up their >> digital images 200 times? But Panasonic knew what its camera would be up >> against. How in the world could they have let the cameras leave the >> plant looking conspicuously less commanding then their peers? >> >> I suspect Leica is waiting for improvements before releasing the camera >> under its name. It hard to ask for a premium price when lower priced >> cameras are out performing you. > >I find all these testing results very odd. Chasseur d'Images has tested the >Panasonic camera and came to the conclusion that it is an excellent camera, >with flattering picture quality. > >Odd. Very odd. This has certainly made me cautious. I lost my digital camera and need one for work. I was going to lash out with the diglux, so that ifffffff I took a good image, it could still go in for FOM2, but now the alternatives need to be considered. Please someone tell me it "aint" so. ;-) - -- Alastair Firkin http://www.afirkin.com http://www.familyofman2.com ()" "'() ()" "() ()" "() ( '0',) ( '0' ) ( '0', ) (,,)(")(") (")(") (")(")(,) - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html